Canadian research peptides · independently tested
Canada’s most documented peptide source — 244 independent lab reports, a published purity floor of 93.844%, and domestic shipping.
We are an affiliate: if you order from Growth Guys using this code we earn a commission, at no extra cost to you. We are not Growth Guys and have no ownership of or role in the company.
You don't need to memorize all seven. Our free quiz runs exactly these flags against any vendor and scores it.
🧪 Run the free vendor check →Deeper dives: how to read a COA · how to spot a fake lab.
Not every warning on a red-flag list carries the same weight, and treating them as equal is how buyers end up rejecting honest vendors for cosmetic reasons while accepting dishonest ones that look polished. The flags that predict a bad outcome are the ones about evidence: testing that cannot be verified outside the vendor, a laboratory that serves only that vendor, reports that do not match the batch on the label, and a signatory who does not exist. The flags that predict very little are the ones about presentation: website design, payment methods, response speed, follower counts. A useful list separates the two, and a buyer's time is best spent on the first group.
Unverifiable testing. A vendor-hosted PDF with no laboratory lookup behind it is a claim, not evidence. A captive laboratory. One client, a domain registered alongside the vendor's, no accreditation, no other footprint. Batch mismatch. Reports whose batches no current vial carries. Curated archives. A results set with no weak numbers in it has been filtered before publication. Health claims on product pages. Dosing and outcomes on a page for a research chemical means the vendor is either ignoring or misunderstanding the category it sells in. A change of payment channel after you have chosen one. The flag most closely associated with parcels that never arrive. Evasion on a direct question. Ask which laboratory and which batch; reassurance in reply is the answer.
An amateurish website, a thin social presence, no phone number, e-transfer or crypto as options, prices below the category average, slow email. Each of these is common among small honest operations and absent from many dishonest ones. Notice them; do not decide on them.
A report that resolves on an independent laboratory's own domain, naming the vendor as client, for the batch on the label, in an archive that also shows the vendor's weaker results. A vendor with that has answered every question the red flags ask. Everything else on the list is a way of noticing its absence.
Run the evidence flags first, because they take two minutes and settle most cases. Use the presentation flags only to decide how carefully to run the evidence ones. And when a vendor fails an evidence flag, ask before rejecting: a vendor that answers a batch question with a batch number has just passed the test the flag was checking for.
For context on the vendor used as the example here: HEALTHYLIFE10 takes 10% off sitewide at Growth Guys (growthguys.com) whatever the payment method, rising to 30% in total with Bitcoin, where the store applies 20% of its own, with no minimum purchase and no product exclusions.
Testing: 244 Janoshik reports across 133 products, 99.03% mean purity over the 181 that state a figure, 93.844% to 99.99%, each hosted on the testing lab's domain. Shipping: from inside Canada, in Canadian dollars, with no customs step for a Canadian buyer. Time: the vendor has been answering publicly in its own forum threads since November 2021. All of it, itemised.